首页> 外文OA文献 >Corn Processing Method in Finishing Diets Containing Wet Corn Gluten Feed
【2h】

Corn Processing Method in Finishing Diets Containing Wet Corn Gluten Feed

机译:含湿玉米麸质饲料的日粮玉米加工方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Two trials were conducted to determine the effect of corn processing method on performance and carcass traits in steers fed finishing diets containing wet corn gluten feed (WCGF). In Trial 1, 480 steer calves (303 kg initial BW) were fed eight finishing diets: 1) dry-rolled corn (DRC) without; and 2) with 32% (DM basis) WCGF; 3) steam-flaked corn (SFC) without; and 4) with WCGF; 5) a combination of DRC and SFC without WCGF; 6) finely-ground corn (FGC) with WCGF; 7) high-moisture corn (HMC) with WCGF; and 8) whole corn (WC) with WCGF. Feeding WC + WCGF increased (P \u3c 0.10) DMI and decreased gain:feed compared with all other treatments. Feeding DRC + WCGF increased (P \u3c 0.10) DMI and decreased (P \u3c 0.10) gain:feed compared with treatments other than WC + WCGF. Steers on treatments that included WCGF gained similarly, regardless of corn processing method, and at a rate 6% faster (P \u3c 0.10) than steers fed diets that did not include WCGF. Gain:feed did not differ among steers fed SFC, SFC + WCGF, SFC + DRC, and HMC + WCGF. Steers fed SFC or SFC + WCGF were more efficient (P \u3c 0.10) than steers fed DRC or FGC + WCGF. In Trial 2, 288 steer calves (382 kg initial BW) were fed six finishing diets: 1) DRC without; and 2) with 22% (DM basis) WCGF; 3) SFC without; and 4) with WCGF; 5) finely rolled corn (FRC) with WCGF; and 6) HMC corn with WCGF. Steers fed DRC + WCGF or FRC + WCGF consumed more DM (P \u3c 0.10) than steers fed DRC, SFC, or SFC + WCGF. Feed intake did not differ between steers fed SFC + WCGF and HMC + WCGF. All treatment groups receiving WCGF consumed more DM (P \u3c 0.10) feed than steers fed DRC or SFC without WCGF. Steers fed SFC + WCGF gained 8% faster (P \u3c 0.10), and steers fed DRC 9.5% slower (P \u3c 0.10) than steers receiving all other treatments. Daily gains did not differ among other treatment groups. Steers fed SFC or SFC + WCGF gained 10% more (P \u3c 0.10) efficiently than all other treatment groups. Feed efficiency did not differ among steers fed DRC, DRC + WCGF, FRC + WCGF, and HMC + WCGF. Estimates for the NEg of WCGF calculated from animal performance indicated that WCGF contained approximately 25.3% more energy when fed with SFC than when fed with DRC. In general, more intensively processing corn improved gain:feed in finishing diets containing WCGF.
机译:进行了两项试验,以确定玉米加工方法对饲喂含有湿玉米蛋白饲料(WCGF)的日粮的ers牛皮的性能和and体性状的影响。在试验1中,对480头牛犊(初始体重303千克)进行了八种日粮饲喂:1)不添加干轧玉米(DRC); 2)含32%(以干物质基准)的WCGF; 3)不加蒸汽玉米片(SFC);和4)使用WCGF; 5)没有WCGF的DRC和SFC的组合; 6)用WCGF细磨玉米(FGC); 7)带有WCGF的高水分玉米(HMC); 8)带有WCGF的整个玉米(WC)。与所有其他处理相比,饲喂WC + WCGF增加(P <0.10)DMI并降低增益:饲喂。与除WC + WCGF以外的其他处理相比,饲喂DRC + WCGF的DMI增加(P 0.10),而饲喂的DMI下降(P 0.10)。无论采用哪种玉米加工方法,使用含WCGF的处理的公牛的饲喂量均比不含WCGF的饲喂的公牛的生长速度快6%(P <0.13)。增重:饲料在SFC,SFC + WCGF,SFC + DRC和HMC + WCGF之间没有差异。饲喂SFC或SFC + WCGF的ers牛皮比饲喂DRC或FGC + WCGF的ers牛皮更有效(P \ u3c 0.10)。在试验2中,为288头牛犊(初始体重382千克)喂了6种最终日粮:1)不添加DRC;和2)含22%(以干物质基准)的WCGF; 3)没有证监会;和4)使用WCGF; 5)用WCGF精轧玉米(FRC); 6)HMC玉米和WCGF。饲喂DRC + WCGF或FRC + WCGF的公牛比饲喂DRC,SFC或SFC + WCGF的公牛消耗更多的DM(P \ u3c 0.10)。饲喂SFC + WCGF和HMC + WCGF的ste牛的采食量没有差异。所有接受WCGF的治疗组比不添加WCGF的DRC或SFC饲喂的ste牛皮消耗更多的DM(P <0.13)饲料。饲喂SFC + WCGF的牛皮的生长速度比接受其他所有处理的ers牛皮的生长速度快8%(P <0.10),而饲喂DRC的ste牛皮的速度慢9.5%(P <0.10)。其他治疗组之间的每日收益没有差异。饲喂SFC或SFC + WCGF的ers牛皮比所有其他处理组的增幅高10%(P <0.13)。饲喂DRC,DRC + WCGF,FRC + WCGF和HMC + WCGF的ste牛的饲料效率没有差异。从动物的行为计算得出的WCGF的NEg估算值表明,喂食SFC时WCGF比喂DRC时多含25.3%的能量。一般而言,更密集地加工玉米可改善含WCGF的日粮的饲料:饲料。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号